From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Major Builders Corp. v. Commercial Un. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1989
155 A.D.2d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 9, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton Sherman, J.).


This is an action for a declaratory judgment in which plaintiff sought to compel defendant to assume its defense in the underlying action brought by an owner of a project in July 1986 against plaintiff here, the general contractor and several subcontractors. The owner's action sounded in both negligence, which was covered by insurance, and contract, which was not. Plaintiff's insurance company, defendant Commercial, disclaimed coverage in September 1986. The disclaimer was without basis.

In view of the fact that plaintiff Major, because of defendant's disclaimer, has had an attorney of its choosing for three years and because of potential conflicts between plaintiff and defendant on how the case should be pursued, we deem it appropriate that plaintiff choose its own counsel. (Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co. v Goldfarb, 53 N.Y.2d 392, 401.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Major Builders Corp. v. Commercial Un. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1989
155 A.D.2d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Major Builders Corp. v. Commercial Un. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MAJOR BUILDERS CORP., Appellant, v. COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
546 N.Y.S.2d 866

Citing Cases

U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. TNP Trucking Inc.

TNP cites a number of New York cases in support of its position. See Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.,…

Sordoni Constr. Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of Can.

Furthermore, a change in counsel at this juncture of litigation in the Cross Action would be prejudicial to…