From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Majid v. Gonzalez

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 2, 2006
CIV-06-455-R (W.D. Okla. Oct. 2, 2006)

Summary

dismissing without prejudice instead of transfer "because continuation of proceedings under Section 2241 would be futile"

Summary of this case from Spurlin v. (FNU) (LNU)

Opinion

CIV-06-455-R.

October 2, 2006


ORDER


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach entered August 22, 2006. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 20] is ADOPTED in its entirety and the petition of Mohammed Abdul Majid for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice for improper venue.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Majid v. Gonzalez

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 2, 2006
CIV-06-455-R (W.D. Okla. Oct. 2, 2006)

dismissing without prejudice instead of transfer "because continuation of proceedings under Section 2241 would be futile"

Summary of this case from Spurlin v. (FNU) (LNU)
Case details for

Majid v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:MOHAMMED ABDUL MAJID, Petitioner, v. ALBERTO GONZALEZ, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 2, 2006

Citations

CIV-06-455-R (W.D. Okla. Oct. 2, 2006)

Citing Cases

Spurlin v. (FNU) (LNU)

Trujillo v. Williams, 465 F.3d 1210, 1222-23 (10th Cir. 2006) (citation omitted). Therefore, the Court…