From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maizonet v. Lee Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 21, 1960
11 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

June 21, 1960


Order, denying motion to dismiss complaint for failure to prosecute, dated February 10, 1960, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendants-appellants, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Neither the belated filing of the note of issue nor the vague allegations regarding settlement discussions excuses the 28-month delay ( Nigro v. City of New York, 3 A.D.2d 987; cf. Trapani v. Samuels, 3 A.D.2d 861). Moreover, no affidavit of merit was submitted in opposition to the motion ( Gallagher v. Clafington, Inc., 7 A.D.2d 627).

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.


Summaries of

Maizonet v. Lee Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 21, 1960
11 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Maizonet v. Lee Properties, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICARDA MAIZONET, Respondent, v. LEE PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Spring Lake Hotel, Inc.

The only affidavit in answer to the motion is that of plaintiffs' attorney and does no more than to state…

Sortino v. Fisher

The excuse, however, ceases to have effect within a brief interval after the last communication (e.g., Wilson…