From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maixner v. Bank of America Home Loans

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 3, 2011
Civ. No. 10-3037-CL (D. Or. Mar. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-3037-CL.

March 3, 2011


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Plaintiffs have filed objections. I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

After reviewing plaintiffs' complaint, I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that the RICO claim must be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. I also agree that plaintiffs' TILA claim for rescission must be dismissed with prejudice because it is barred by TILA's statute of limitations. I find no error in the Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#40) is adopted. Plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to all defendants, except as to the RICO and TILA rescission claims, which are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint within thirty days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 3 day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

Maixner v. Bank of America Home Loans

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 3, 2011
Civ. No. 10-3037-CL (D. Or. Mar. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Maixner v. Bank of America Home Loans

Case Details

Full title:GARY EARL MAIXNER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS, et…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 3, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. 10-3037-CL (D. Or. Mar. 3, 2011)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. City of Yachats

The Rule “is designed to strike at unintelligibility rather than want of detail.” Maixner v. Bank of Am. Home…

Brooks v. Clyne

Rule 12(e) is designed to strike at unintelligibility rather than want of detail. Maixner v. Bank of Am. Home…