From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maisto v. Maisto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1981
85 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

December 31, 1981


In an action for partition, plaintiff husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), entered March 27, 1981, which, inter alia, dismissed the complaint and awarded the defendant wife alimony and child support arrears upon her counterclaim. Judgment modified, on the law, by reducing the award for disbursements by the sum of $205. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. An expenditure to procure a transcript of trial minutes in order to aid counsel in his preparation of a posttrial memorandum of law is not properly a taxable disbursement (see Hempstead Bank v Ryan, 42 A.D.2d 779; Schurre v Borden, 242 App. Div. 802 [Appeal No. 2]; Long Is. Contr. Supply Co. v City of New York, 142 App. Div. 1, 2). Plaintiff's other claims of error are without merit. In particular, we find that Special Term properly exercised its discretion in withholding enforcement of that portion of the divorce decree directing a sale of the former marital premises upon the occurrence of the condition subsequent, now fulfilled, in view of the present extent of plaintiff's failure to comply with the support provisions of the same decree. Cohalan, J.P., O'Connor, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maisto v. Maisto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1981
85 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Maisto v. Maisto

Case Details

Full title:NUNZIO S. MAISTO, Appellant, v. MARGUERITE H. MAISTO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1981

Citations

85 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Clickner v. Shanley

Photocopying expenses have generally not been allowed as taxable disbursements (Matter of Guggino, 166 Misc.…