From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maisto v. Maisto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 1980
75 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

May 27, 1980


In an action for partition of real property formerly owned by the parties as tenants by the entirety, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County dated November 20, 1979, which (1) denied her motion for summary judgment upon her counterclaim, and (2) granted, sua sponte, partial summary judgment to the plaintiff dismissing the counterclaim without prejudice to an application by the defendant for a judgment pursuant to section 244 Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law. Order modified, on the law, by deleting the provision granting partial summary judgment to the plaintiff dismissing the counterclaim. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term erred in dismissing the defendant's counterclaim for arrears due under a judgment of divorce. A formal application pursuant to section 244 Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law may be dispensed with in appropriate circumstances. (See McDonald v. McDonald, 30 A.D.2d 866. ) In the case at bar, the defendant should have been permitted to interpose a counterclaim for arrears in an action brought by her former husband for partition of the marital home. Moreover, we are of the view that there are issues of fact which preclude summary judgment herein. (See Salvati v. Salvati, 37 A.D.2d 858.) Mangano, J.P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maisto v. Maisto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 1980
75 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Maisto v. Maisto

Case Details

Full title:NUNZIO S. MAISTO, Respondent, v. MARGUERITE H. MAISTO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 27, 1980

Citations

75 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Wawrzusin v. Wawrzusin

Further, the defendant's claim for reimbursements for the cost of the addition to the residence was properly…