From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maisch v. Millard Fillmore Hospitals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 18, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, LaMendola, J. — Discovery.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Millard Fillmore Hospitals (Hospital), Karen Blackford, Sharon Woodin and Yukio Sonoda, M.D. (defendants) for a protective order prohibiting plaintiffs' use in this malpractice action of a letter report written by the chairperson of the Department of Obstetrics Gynecology at the Hospital. No incident report was made by the Hospital to the Department of Health pursuant to Public Health Law § 2805-i, and the statutes providing confidentiality and prohibiting disclosure of such reports therefore do not apply ( see, Public Health Law § 2805-m; Education Law § 6527). Defendants did not establish that the letter report in question was generated in connection with a quality assurance review function pursuant to Education Law § 6527 (3) or a malpractice prevention program pursuant to Public Health Law § 2805-j ( see, Crea v. Newfane Inter-Community Mem. Hosp., 224 A.D.2d 976, 977; Zion v. New York Hosp., 184 A.D.2d 441, rearg granted 183 A.D.2d 386). Thus, they have not met their burden of establishing that the document is entitled to statutory confidentiality and protection from disclosure ( see, Koump v. Smith, 25 N.Y.2d 287, 294-295; Westhampton Adult Home v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 105 A.D.2d 627, 628).


Summaries of

Maisch v. Millard Fillmore Hospitals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Maisch v. Millard Fillmore Hospitals

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE A. MAISCH AND BARBARA J. MAISCH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 536

Citing Cases

DiPasquale v. Lim

Initially, there is no dispute that the subject email is material and necessary in the prosecution of this…

Swanson v. University of Rochester

Where the Defendant hospital fails to establish that the items being requested by Plaintiff "were generated…