From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maiorano v. Town of Cortlandt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 1994
209 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 14, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment dated February 19, 1993 is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated March 25, 1993, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

We agree with the defendant's contention that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the plaintiff's action for a declaratory judgment. A declaratory judgment action may not be used to circumvent the normal appellate process (see, Bower Gardner v. Evans, 60 N.Y.2d 781; Rodriguez v. City Ct., 138 A.D.2d 475). The plaintiff could have appealed from his convictions of several statutory violations and thus raise the issues presented in this action.

In light of our determination, the plaintiff's remaining contentions need not be addressed. Balletta, J.P., Pizzuto, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maiorano v. Town of Cortlandt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 1994
209 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Maiorano v. Town of Cortlandt

Case Details

Full title:GENE MAIORANO, Appellant, v. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 633

Citing Cases

Gregg v. Chen

In addition, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of Gregg's motion which was for a declaration that…