From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maione v. Zucker

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 15, 2022
18 CIVIL 7452 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2022)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 7452 (KMK)

03-15-2022

SCOTT MAIONE AND TASHA OSTLER, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of their three infant children, Plaintiffs, v. DR. HOWARD A. ZUCKER, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 15, 2022, both Motions are granted in full. All claims against Defendant Sherwood are dismissed without prejudice. All claims against the remaining Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. See Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 471 (2d Cir. 1978) (holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to "a third go-around"); Melvin v. County of Westchester, No. 14-CV-2995, 2016 WL 1254394, at *24 n.19 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2016) (granting motion to dismiss with prejudice where "[the] [p]laintiff has already had two bites at the apple, and they have proven fruitless" (alteration and quotation marks omitted)).


Summaries of

Maione v. Zucker

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 15, 2022
18 CIVIL 7452 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Maione v. Zucker

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT MAIONE AND TASHA OSTLER, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 15, 2022

Citations

18 CIVIL 7452 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2022)