From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maio v. Arnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 7, 1994
203 A.D.2d 82 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).


The trial court's limiting of the scope of the direct and redirect examination of plaintiff's expert witness was not an abuse of discretion (see, Feldsberg v Nitschke, 49 N.Y.2d 636). Nor did the trial court's instruction to the jury on the law of "error in judgment" reach the level of reversible error.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Maio v. Arnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 7, 1994
203 A.D.2d 82 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Maio v. Arnett

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MAIO et al., Appellants, v. JAN ARNETT, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 82 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 781

Citing Cases

In re Bk. of N.Y. v. Assessor of Vil. of Bronxville

It is well-settled that the scope of redirect examination is within the discretion of the trial court [See…