Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-2737-WJM-CBS
07-08-2013
ROY J. MAIN, Plaintiff, v. RAE TIMME, Warden, Defendant.
Judge William J. Martínez
ORDER ADOPTING JUNE 11, 2013 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2241
This matter is before the Court on the June 11, 2013 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 26) that Plaintiff's Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1) be denied. The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 26, at 9-10.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation have to date been received.
The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's analysis was thorough and sound, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) ("In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate's report under any standard it deems appropriate.").
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows: (1) The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (ECF No. 26) is ADOPTED in its entirety; (2) Plaintiff's Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and (3) The above captioned matter is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (4) The Clerk shall close the case. Each party shall bear his or its own costs.
BY THE COURT:
______________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge