Opinion
May 11, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.).
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, and the physical examination of the plaintiff shall continue at such time and place as shall be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by the appellants, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree.
The plaintiff commenced the instant action against multiple defendants, including the appellants, to recover damages for personal injuries. When he appeared at the office of the appellants' physician for a medical examination, however, he refused to answer any questions related to his medical history and refused to allow certain medical tests to be performed.
The appellants are entitled to another physical examination of the plaintiff. By bringing the instant action, the plaintiff placed his physical condition in issue ( see, Koump v. Smith, 25 N.Y.2d 287; Lefkowitz v. Nassau County Med. Ctr., 94 A.D.2d 18, 21), and a physical examination "is relevant to determining the causal relationship between the plaintiffs current condition and the defendants' alleged negligence" ( Lapera v. Shafron, 159 A.D.2d 614). Because the plaintiff's medical history, especially concerning his diabetic condition, was "not only an appropriate area of inquiry but is generally necessary for a meaningful examination, [the plaintff's] refusal to participate therein was error" ( Allen v. State of New York, 228 A.D.2d 1001, 1002). The appellants also sufficiently demonstrated the necessity of tests sought to be performed on the plaintiff ( see, Lapera v. Shafron, supra).
Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.