Opinion
April, 1928.
Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that there was a question of fact as to whether or not plaintiff should be paid for her services, and the question should have been submitted to the jury. Lazansky, P.J., Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Rich and Carswell, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.