From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maiden Lane Service Stations, Inc. v. Rubin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 20, 1956
5 Misc. 2d 328 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)

Opinion

December 20, 1956

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, JOHN J. MANGAN, J., EDWARD F. HURLEY, J.

Thomas I. Brennan for appellants.

Max Tachna and Paul Bauman for respondent.


In the absence of allegation and proof of plans for the erection of the new structure, the landlord was not entitled to a final order for the purpose of demolishing the existing building.

Upon the termination of the written lease, the tenants became statutory tenants and the jury waiver clause of the lease was carried over into the statutory tenancy ( Jamaica Investors v. Blacharsh, 193 Misc. 949).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for tenants, with costs. The intermediate order should be affirmed.

HOFSTADTER, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Maiden Lane Service Stations, Inc. v. Rubin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 20, 1956
5 Misc. 2d 328 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)
Case details for

Maiden Lane Service Stations, Inc. v. Rubin

Case Details

Full title:MAIDEN LANE SERVICE STATIONS, INC., Respondent, v. HELEN C. RUBIN et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1956

Citations

5 Misc. 2d 328 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)
159 N.Y.S.2d 268

Citing Cases

Matter of Brown v. Denner

The principle behind these holdings is that the projection of such covenants is not essential to effectuate…

Matter of 149 E. 48th St. v. Weaver

[c], [cc]; L. 1945, chs. 3, 314, as amd.; see, also, Maiden Lane Service Stas. v. Rubin, 5 Misc.2d 328.) It…