From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mahoney v. Zerillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2004
6 A.D.3d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-04201.

Decided April 5, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), dated April 23, 2003, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

M. Sean Duffy, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Anthony J. Keogh, White Plains, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident ( see Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955). The affirmation of the plaintiff's physician, submitted in opposition to the defendant's motion, was based upon an examination conducted shortly after the accident and three years before the motion for summary judgment ( see Covington v. Cinnirella, 146 A.D.2d 565; also Zuckerman v. Karagjozi, 247 A.D.2d 536). This affirmation impermissibly relied upon the unsworn reports of other doctors ( see Friedman v. U-Haul Truck Rental, 216 A.D.2d 266) and upon the plaintiff's subjective complaints of pain ( see Barrett v. Howland, 202 A.D.2d 383; LeBrun v. Joyner, 195 A.D.2d 502; Coughlan v. Donnelly, 172 A.D.2d 480), and failed to take into account the fact that the plaintiff was injured in a subsequent automobile accident ( see Dimenshteyn v. Caruso, 262 A.D.2d 348). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mahoney v. Zerillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2004
6 A.D.3d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Mahoney v. Zerillo

Case Details

Full title:KELLY MAHONEY, appellant, v. AMY ZERILLO, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 378

Citing Cases

Zhang v. Wang

ith one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The defendants'…

Weiss v. City of Long Beach

The emergency room records prove the occurrence of the accident, but do not provide any indication that a…