From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mahmoud v. Sisolak

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 9, 2023
2:22-cv-00615-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00615-APG-VCF

08-09-2023

MOHAMED ABDALLA MAHMOUD, Plaintiff v. STEVE SISOLAK, et al., Defendants


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

[ECF Nos. 25, 37]

ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I previously denied plaintiff Mohamed Mahmoud's motion for preliminary injunction. ECF No. 24. Mahmoud now moves for reconsideration of my order. ECF Nos. 25, 37. Mahmoud does not offer sufficient reasons for me to change my mind. And, it appears that he has now received the materials that were the subject of his original motion. ECF No. 37 at 1 (“Sgt. Estill agreed to allow the plaintiff to inventory and receive[] most of his property.”).

I THEREFORE ORDER that the motions for reconsideration (ECF Nos. 25, 37) are denied.


Summaries of

Mahmoud v. Sisolak

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 9, 2023
2:22-cv-00615-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Mahmoud v. Sisolak

Case Details

Full title:MOHAMED ABDALLA MAHMOUD, Plaintiff v. STEVE SISOLAK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 9, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00615-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2023)