From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mahathey v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 27, 2023
No. 18874-22 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 27, 2023)

Opinion

18874-22

06-27-2023

CLIFTON E. MAHATHEY & JESSICA CANTU, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

By Order to Show Cause served April 4, 2023, the Court directed each party to show cause in writing why this deficiency case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the Petition was not filed within the time prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code.

On April 26, 2023, respondent filed a Response. Therein, respondent asserts that the Petition was not timely filed. To date, petitioners have failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause. The record in this case establishes that, as respondent asserts, the Petition was not timely filed. See I.R.C. §§ 6213(a), 7502; Hallmark Research Collective v. Commissioner, No. 21284-21, 159 T.C. (Nov. 29, 2022). Consequently, we must dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction.

In consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause is hereby made absolute. It is further

ORDERED that, on the Court's own motion, this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Mahathey v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 27, 2023
No. 18874-22 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Mahathey v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON E. MAHATHEY & JESSICA CANTU, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 27, 2023

Citations

No. 18874-22 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 27, 2023)