From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maharaj v. Budget Finance Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 584
Oct 15, 2008
296 F. App'x 583 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-55814.

Submitted October 6, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 15, 2008.

Alfreda E. Maharaj, Hesperia, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

L. Douglas Brown, Cory A. Baskin, Locke Lord Bissell Liddell, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00990-DSF-JCR.

Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appellant Alfreda Maharaj appeals the district court's judgment dismissing her case for failure to state claim upon which relief can be granted. This court reviews the district court's order de novo, and we affirm. See Love v. United States, 915 F.2d 1242 (9th Cir. 1989); Gibson v. United States, 781 F.2d 1334, 1337 (9th Cir. 1986).

Our review of the record and of appellant's response to this court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Maharaj v. Budget Finance Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 584
Oct 15, 2008
296 F. App'x 583 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Maharaj v. Budget Finance Co.

Case Details

Full title:Alfreda E. MAHARAJ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUDGET FINANCE COMPANY, GMAC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 584

Date published: Oct 15, 2008

Citations

296 F. App'x 583 (9th Cir. 2008)