From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maguire v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2003
306 A.D.2d 253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-05634

Argued May 9, 2003.

June 2, 2003.

In an action pursuant to Executive Law § 296 alleging discrimination based on gender, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered May 17, 2002, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Greenfield Stein Senior, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Paul T. Shoemaker and Elana L. Damer of counsel), for appellant.

Jackson Lewis, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Joseph A. Saccomano, Jr., and Jonathan M. Kozak of counsel), for respondent Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant made a prima facie showing that its failure to grant the plaintiff post-employment benefits was not the result of gender discrimination (see Ferrante v. American Lung Assn., 90 N.Y.2d 623; Liebowitz v. Luitpold Pharms., 288 A.D.2d 352). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the proffered reasons for the defendant's actions were pretextual. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FRIEDMANN, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maguire v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2003
306 A.D.2d 253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Maguire v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARY ANN MAGUIRE, appellant, v. QUAKER RIDGE GOLF CLUB, INC., respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 234

Citing Cases

Rios v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.

Instead, they proffer only the unsubstantiated allegation that they were treated differently from other…

Defrancis v. Plainview

The plaintiff, an at-will employee, claims that he was terminated from his employment as a security guard at…