From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magruder v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS
Nov 2, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-15 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 2, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-15

11-02-2016

STACEY L. MAGRUDER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


(BAILEY)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On this day, the above-styled matter came before this Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble [Doc. 23]. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rules, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Trumble's for submission of a proposed Report and Recommendation ("R & R"). Magistrate Judge Trumble filed his R&R on October 14, 2016, wherein he recommends this Court grant defendant Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin's ("the Commissioner") Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 14], and deny plaintiff Stacey L. Magruder's ("Magruder's") Statement of Errors [Doc. 8].

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), this Court is required to make a de novo review of those portions of the magistrate judge's findings to which objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour , 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce , 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Here, objections to Magistrate Judge Trumble's R&R were due within fourteen (14) days of receipt, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). The docket reflects that the R&R was electronically mailed to all counsel of record on October 14, 2016, and that service was accepted the same day [Doc. 23]. To date, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, this Court will review the R&R for clear error.

Upon careful review of the above, it is the opinion of this Court that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 23] should be, and is, hereby ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated in the magistrate judge's report.

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 14] is GRANTED, and that plaintiff Magruder's Statement of Errors [Doc. 8] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgement in favor of the defendant. Finally, this matter is ORDERED STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED: November 2, 2016.

/s/ _________

JOHN PRESTON BAILEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Magruder v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS
Nov 2, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-15 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Magruder v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:STACEY L. MAGRUDER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS

Date published: Nov 2, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-15 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 2, 2016)