From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magoon v. Bd. Civil Auth., Town Johnson

Supreme Court of Vermont
Feb 2, 1982
442 A.2d 1276 (Vt. 1982)

Summary

holding that plaintiffs were not liable for real estate taxes on property currently in their possession because the State owned and held fee simple title in the land

Summary of this case from Gordon v. Bd. of Civil Auth

Opinion

No. 406-80

Opinion Filed February 2, 1982

1. Taxation — Real Property — Generally

Real estate, within the meaning of the tax law, is land with its fixtures and accessories measurable and capable of description by metes and bounds. 32 V.S.A. § 3802.

2. Taxation — Exemptions — Government Property

Absent an exception, the land and buildings owned by the state are exempt from local property tax. 32 V.S.A. § 3802.

3. Taxation — Exemptions — Government Property

Where property owners had conveyed in 1979 a parcel of land consisting of 156 acres to the State of Vermont, which conveyance reserved to the former owners for a term of forty years the exclusive use and control of forty-five acres of the parcel on which was situated a cottage and pond, the town in which the property was situated could, in the years 1979 and 1980, only tax the 156-acre parcel pursuant to the statute allowing for a limited tax on state forests and parks. 32 V.S.A. § 3615 (repealed May 7, 1980).

4. Statutes — Construction and Application — Legislative Intent

In construing a statute, the real meaning and purpose of the legislature is to be sought, and if a fair and reasonable construction discloses it, it is to be given effect.

5. Statutes — Construction and Application — Tax Laws

A taxing statute is not to be extended by implication beyond the clear import of the language used, and doubts are to be resolved against the taxing power.

6. Taxation — Exemptions — Construction of Laws

The statute which permits a town, village, school and fire district to list the last owner or possessor of real estate in the grand list is a general rule that is applicable to property that is already taxable and by its plain language does not apply to properties already tax exempt pursuant to the property tax exemption statute. 32 V.S.A. §§ 3651, 3802.

7. Taxation — Exemptions — Government Property

Trial court erred in concluding that town could list forty-five acre parcel conveyed by property owners to the State of Vermont, with reservation of the exclusive use and control of the parcel to the former owners for a term of years, since the fee simple title in the parcel was owned by the state and exempt from local tax under the general exemption from property tax statute, and the land was only taxable pursuant to the statute allowing for a limited tax on state forests and parks. 32 V.S.A. §§ 3615 (repealed May 7, 1980), 3651, 3802.

Appeal from assessment of property tax. Lamoille Superior Court, Gibson, J., presiding. Reversed.

John J. Easton, Jr., Attorney General, and J. Wallace Malley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Montpelier, for Intervenor.

Sargent White, Morrisville, for Defendant.

Present: Billings, Hill and Underwood, JJ., and Daley and Larrow, JJ. (Ret.), Specially Assigned


In 1979 plaintiffs-appellees Robert and Adeline Magoon conveyed to the intervenor State of Vermont a parcel of land consisting of 156 acres, more or less. The conveyance reserved to the Magoons for a term of forty years the exclusive use and control of forty-five acres of the parcel on which was situated a cottage and pond. In 1979 and 1980 defendant-appellee Town of Johnson assessed the forty-five acre parcel with pond and cottage to the Magoons. The Magoons paid the taxes under protest and appealed the assessment unsuccessfully to the Board of Civil Authority and then to the Lamoille Superior Court claiming that the land in question had been deeded to the State of Vermont and was not taxable to them. The State of Vermont was allowed to intervene, V.R.C.P. 24, and now appeals the trial court's order.

The State acquired by deed a fee simple absolute title in the forty-five acres with the reservation of an estate for a term of forty years. 32 V.S.A. § 3802 provides:

The following property shall be exempt from taxation:

(1) Real and personal estate owned by this state, except as otherwise provided . . . .

Real estate within the meaning of the tax law is land with its fixtures and accessories measurable and capable of description by metes and bounds. Hughes v. Vail, 57 Vt. 41, 44 (1885). Absent an exception the land and buildings owned by the State are exempt. The only exception applicable in 1979 and 1980 was 32 V.S.A. § 3615 (repealed May 7, 1980), which provided for a limited tax as follows:

Land held as state forests and parks shall be taxed annually, under the general tax law, at the local rate on a listed value of the land alone of not more than $8.00 an acre. . . .

The defendant can only tax the 156-acre parcel pursuant to this statute. To do otherwise is error. Sherburne Corp. v. Town of Sherburne, 124 Vt. 481, 482, 207 A.2d 125, 126 (1965).

Defendant claims that 32 V.S.A. § 3651 provides an exception to the general exempt status of state-owned land in that the town can tax the Magoons as possessors of real estate. 32 V.S.A. § 3651 provides:

Taxable real estate shall be set in the list to the last owner or possessor thereof on April 1 in each year in the town, village, school and fire district where it is situated.

In construing a statute, the real meaning and purpose of the Legislature is to be sought, and if a fair and reasonable construction discloses it, it is to be given effect. Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Morrison, 118 Vt. 417, 420, 110 A.2d 700, 701 (1955). However, a taxing statute is not to be extended by implication beyond the clear import of the language used, and doubts are to be resolved against the taxing power. Id. 32 V.S.A. § 3651 is a general rule applicable to property that is already taxable. By its plain language it does not apply to properties already tax exempt pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 3802.

The trial court was in error in concluding that the defendant could list the forty-five acres reserved for a term of years to the Magoons, because the fee simple title was owned by the State of Vermont.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Magoon v. Bd. Civil Auth., Town Johnson

Supreme Court of Vermont
Feb 2, 1982
442 A.2d 1276 (Vt. 1982)

holding that plaintiffs were not liable for real estate taxes on property currently in their possession because the State owned and held fee simple title in the land

Summary of this case from Gordon v. Bd. of Civil Auth
Case details for

Magoon v. Bd. Civil Auth., Town Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Robert A. Magoon and Adeline M. Magoon; and State of Vermont v. Board of…

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Feb 2, 1982

Citations

442 A.2d 1276 (Vt. 1982)
442 A.2d 1276

Citing Cases

Sherburne Corp. v. Town of Sherburne

Real estate owned by the State is excluded under § 3802(1) from "[t]axable real estate," which, pursuant to §…

Town of Cambridge v. Bassett

A statutory construction which is "fair and reasonable" and which discloses the "real meaning and purpose" of…