From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magnetic v. Toggliotti

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 6, 2016
Case No. 2:16-CV-638 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Jul. 6, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-CV-638 JCM (PAL)

07-06-2016

INFINITE MASTER MAGNETIC, aka Jesse Jerome Pointer, Plaintiff(s), v. JUDGE TOGGLIOTTI, Defendant(s).


ORDER

Presently before the court are the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leen. (ECF No. 8). No objections were filed, and the deadline for filing objections has passed.

Magistrate Judge Leen recommended that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to file a completed IFP application or take any other action to prosecute the case.

This court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party timely objects to a magistrate judge's findings and recommendation, then the court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report and recommendation to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Where a party fails to object, however, the court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003) (disregarding the standard of review employed by the district court when reviewing a report and recommendation to which no objections were made); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (reading the Ninth Circuit's decision in Reyna-Tapia as adopting the view that district courts are not required to review "any issue that is not the subject of an objection."). Thus, if there is no objection to a magistrate judge's recommendation, then this court may accept the recommendation without review. See, e.g., Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d at 1226 (accepting, without review, a magistrate judge's recommendation to which no objection was filed).

Nevertheless, this court finds it appropriate to engage in a de novo review to determine whether to adopt the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Upon reviewing the recommendation and underlying briefs, this court finds good cause to ADOPT the magistrate judge's findings in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leen (ECF No. 8), are ADOPTED in their entirety.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The clerk is instructed to close the case.

DATED July 6, 2016.

/s/ James C. Mahan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Magnetic v. Toggliotti

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 6, 2016
Case No. 2:16-CV-638 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Jul. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Magnetic v. Toggliotti

Case Details

Full title:INFINITE MASTER MAGNETIC, aka Jesse Jerome Pointer, Plaintiff(s), v. JUDGE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 6, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:16-CV-638 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Jul. 6, 2016)