From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magnan v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1099 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-1099 GEB KJM P.

August 3, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding with an action under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, through counsel, has filed a third amended complaint.

Plaintiff asks that, because he was released from prison before the filing of his third amended complaint, this court refrain from screening that complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). That statute reads as follows:

(a) Screening. — The court shall review, before docketing, if feasible or, in any event, as soon as practicable after docketing, a complaint in a civil action in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.

Because plaintiff's third amended complaint was filed at a time when plaintiff was not a "prisoner," the court is not required to screen plaintiff's complaint under § 1915A(a).

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's July 5, 2006 "motion to bypass prisoner case screening" is granted; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue summonses for the defendants and forward them to plaintiff's counsel.


Summaries of

Magnan v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1099 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Magnan v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:PAUL MAGNAN, Plaintiff, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 3, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-1099 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)