From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magill v. Esposito

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

09-29-2017

In the Matter of Matthew E. MAGILL, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Lindsay A. ESPOSITO, Respondent–Appellant. Paul B. Watkins, Esq., Attorney for the Child, Appellant.

Bridget L. Field, Rochester, for Respondent–Appellant. The Ward Firm, PLLC, Baldwinsville (Matthew E. Ward of Counsel), for Petitioner–Respondent. Paul B. Watkins, Attorney for the Child, Fairport, Appellant Pro Se.


Bridget L. Field, Rochester, for Respondent–Appellant.The Ward Firm, PLLC, Baldwinsville (Matthew E. Ward of Counsel), for Petitioner–Respondent.

Paul B. Watkins, Attorney for the Child, Fairport, Appellant Pro Se.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, and WINSLOW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Magill v. Esposito

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Magill v. Esposito

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Matthew E. MAGILL, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Lindsay A…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 29, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 1621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
153 A.D.3d 1621