Magill v. Esposito

Full title: IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW E. MAGILL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. LINDSAY A…

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Sep 29, 2017

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 6780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

1016 CAF 16-01227

09-29-2017

IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW E. MAGILL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. LINDSAY A. ESPOSITO, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. PAUL B. WATKINS, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, APPELLANT.

BRIDGET L. FIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. PAUL B. WATKINS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, FAIRPORT, APPELLANT PRO SE. THE WARD FIRM, PLLC, BALDWINSVILLE (MATTHEW E. WARD OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

PRESENT:

BRIDGET L. FIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PAUL B. WATKINS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, FAIRPORT, APPELLANT PRO SE.

THE WARD FIRM, PLLC, BALDWINSVILLE (MATTHEW E. WARD OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered June 16, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, adjudged that the subject child shall primarily reside with petitioner.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: September 29, 2017

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court