From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maggay v. Micke

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
21-04591 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

21-04591 BLF (PR)

09-20-2021

RODERICK MAGGAY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MICKE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO PAY FILING FEE OR FILE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Docket No. 5)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge

On June 28, 2021, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against officers and the medical department of the Santa Rita County Jail. Dkt. No. 1. On the same date, the Clerk sent Plaintiff a notice that within twenty-eight days he must either pay the full filing fee or file an application to proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) in order to proceed with this action or face dismissal. Dkt. No. 2. This matter was reassigned to the Undersigned on July 20, 2021. Dkt. Nos. 4, 7.

On the same date as the reassignment, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed IFP, but the application was not completed. Dkt. No. 5. Rather, Plaintiff handwrote on the first page that he “will send complete payment via Institution Check.” Id. at 1. More than twenty-eight days have passed since the Clerk's notice was sent to Plaintiff, and nearly two months have passed since Plaintiffs incomplete IFP motion was filed. To date, no payment has been received from Plaintiff

In the interest of justice, Plaintiff shall be granted an extension of time to either pay the full filing fee, or proof of payment thereof, or a complete IFP application. Plaintiff shall respond no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the filing date of this order.

Failure to respond to this order in the time provided shall result in this action being dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff.

The Clerk shall enclose a copy of the court's IFP application with a copy of this order to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Maggay v. Micke

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
21-04591 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Maggay v. Micke

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK MAGGAY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MICKE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

21-04591 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)