From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maggart v. Kingsbury

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jan 16, 1931
111 Cal.App. 765 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 187.

January 16, 1931.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. G.K. Scovel, Judge. Affirmed.

Head, Wellington Jacobs, I.B. Dockweiler, John Dockweiler, Roy Maggart, George B. Bush and Philip C. Farman for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and H.H. Linney and John W. Maltman, Deputies Attorney-General, for Respondent.

L.W. Blodgett, City Attorney, as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellant.

William A. Barnhill, Hubert T. Morrow, James S. Bennett, Frank G. Finlayson and Finlayson, Bennett Morrow as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent.


[1] The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of Carr v. Kingsbury, (Civ. No. 186) ante, p. 165 [ 295 P. 586], except the description of the property upon which appellant has made his location. The decision in the Carr case has this day been filed. The questions of law involved in the instant case are identical with those in the Carr case, therefore, for the reasons given in the case of Carr v. Kingsbury, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Barnard, P.J., and Warmer, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 11, 1931, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on March 16, 1931.


Summaries of

Maggart v. Kingsbury

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jan 16, 1931
111 Cal.App. 765 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

Maggart v. Kingsbury

Case Details

Full title:ROY MAGGART, Appellant, v. W.S. KINGSBURY, as Chief of the Division of…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 16, 1931

Citations

111 Cal.App. 765 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
295 P. 590