From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mager v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Dec 2, 2003
120 S.W.3d 802 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. WD 62356

December 2, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Boone County, Mo, Honorable Sanford Francis Conley, IV, Judge.

Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

John M. Morris, III, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon and Anne E. Edgington, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Joseph M. Ellis, C.J., Robert G. Ulrich and Thomas H. Newton, JJ.


ORDER


Douglas Mager appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his motion, Mr. Mager sought to vacate his convictions for burglary in the first degree, section 569.160, RSMo 1994, assault in the second degree, section 565.060, RSMo 1994, armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994, and concurrent sentences of five, five, and three years imprisonment, respectively. He claims on appeal that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) adequately examine defense witness Pam Bertrand about prior inconsistent statements made by State's witness Sharon Geiger and (2) object to certain statements made by the prosecutor during her closing argument. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mager v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Dec 2, 2003
120 S.W.3d 802 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Mager v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS MAGER, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Dec 2, 2003

Citations

120 S.W.3d 802 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)