From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magee v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 10, 2015
CASE NO. CV 14-3446 AB (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 14-3446 AB (FFM)

02-10-2015

RUCHELL MAGEE, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the petition with prejudice as to Claims One, Two, Four, and Five, and without prejudice as to Claim Three. DATED: February 10, 2015

/s/_________

ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Magee v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 10, 2015
CASE NO. CV 14-3446 AB (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Magee v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:RUCHELL MAGEE, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 10, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. CV 14-3446 AB (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2015)