Opinion
June 14, 1956
Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, CARROLL HAYES, J.
Morris Schwalb for appellants.
Murray M. Zoberg and Merrill Charlton for respondents.
The court did not specify the grounds on which the motion for a new trial was made and the grounds on which it was decided in the order vacating the judgment after trial and ordering a new trial; no opinion or memorandum was rendered in connection with the motion and such grounds are not indicated in any way. The order, therefore, fails to comply with the requirements of rule 224 of the Rules of Civil Practice ( Morris v. Phillips, 48 N.Y.S.2d 423).
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and judgment reinstated.
Concur — HOFSTADTER, HECHT and AURELIO, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.