Magdaleno v. Erwin

Full title: RAMON J. MAGDALENO, Plaintiff, v. NANCY ERWIN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

1:04 CV F 5726 REC DLB, Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations Re Dismissal of action for Failure to Obey a Court Order and Directing Entry of Judgment for Defendants [DOC 54] (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2005)

Opinion

1:04 CV F 5726 REC DLB, Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations Re Dismissal of action for Failure to Obey a Court Order and Directing Entry of Judgment for Defendants [DOC 54].

October 17, 2005

ROBERT COYLE, District Judge

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on May 17, 2004.

On July 25, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. No party has filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

ACCORDINGLY:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 25, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to obey the court's order of March 15, 2005.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.