From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magana v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 17, 2019
No. 8:19-cv-00021-FMO (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2019)

Opinion

No. 8:19-cv-00021-FMO (JDE)

04-17-2019

MARTIN MARTINEZ MAGANA, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. 2), the Order to Show Cause issued by the assigned United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 6), Petitioner's Reply to the Order to Show Cause (Dkt. 7), and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. 2) is denied; and
(2) Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Dated: April 17, 2019

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Magana v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 17, 2019
No. 8:19-cv-00021-FMO (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2019)
Case details for

Magana v. California

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN MARTINEZ MAGANA, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 17, 2019

Citations

No. 8:19-cv-00021-FMO (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2019)