From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maeda v. Timmons

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Dec 28, 2005
No. 07-05-0442-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 28, 2005)

Opinion

No. 07-05-0442-CV

December 28, 2005.

Appeal from Potter County Court at Law No. 1, No. 93,936-1, Honorable W.F. "Corky" Roberts, Judge.

Panel A: Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Following a pro se notice of appeal challenging a default judgment, appellants Bryce Maeda, et al. were notified by letter dated December 9, 2005, to pay the required filing fee of $125 within ten days, noting that failure to do so might result in dismissal. Unless a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the Clerk of this Court is required to collect filing fees set by statute or the Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See Tex.R.App.P. 5 and 12.1(b). Although the filing of a notice of appeal invokes this Court's jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, the appeal may be dismissed. Tex.R.App.P. 25.1(b). To date, the fee remains unpaid. Thus, we must dismiss the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and with a notice from the Clerk requiring payment of the filing fee. Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(c).


Summaries of

Maeda v. Timmons

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Dec 28, 2005
No. 07-05-0442-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 28, 2005)
Case details for

Maeda v. Timmons

Case Details

Full title:BRYCE MAEDA, ET AL., Appellants, v. DAVID AND RUTH TIMMONS, Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo

Date published: Dec 28, 2005

Citations

No. 07-05-0442-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 28, 2005)