From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madura v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 2, 2010
Civil No. 09-1439-HU (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-1439-HU.

August 2, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Hubel referred to this court a Findings and Recommendation [13] in this matter. The Magistrate Judge recommends that defendant's Motion to Dismiss [10] be granted. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Findings and Recommendation [13] is ADOPTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Madura v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 2, 2010
Civil No. 09-1439-HU (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Madura v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH R. MADURA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Aug 2, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-1439-HU (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2010)