From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madrigal v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2017
Case No. 1:15-cv-00809-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-cv-00809-SAB

02-22-2017

NORMA MADRIGAL, Plaintiff, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On January 31, 2017, Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC filed a motion for summary judgment in this action. In the motion, Defendant contends that Plaintiff Norma Madrigal is not a third party beneficiary to the contract at issue in this action.

The California Civil Code provides that a contract made expressly for the benefit of a third party may be enforced by that party at any time before the contract is rescinded. Cal. Civ. Code § 1559. Ascertaining the intent of the parties is to be inferred solely from the language of the written contract if possible. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1638. While Defendant contends that Plaintiff is not a third party beneficiary under the note and deed of trust that were executed in purchasing the property at issue herein, the note was not included as evidence in support of the motion for summary judgment. / / / / / /

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Nationstar Mortgage shall file a supplement to the motion for summary judgment which includes the note at issue in this action on or before February 27, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 22 , 2017

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Madrigal v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2017
Case No. 1:15-cv-00809-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Madrigal v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Case Details

Full title:NORMA MADRIGAL, Plaintiff, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 22, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:15-cv-00809-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2017)