From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madrigal v. Board of Prison Terms

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 19, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-01704-MCE-KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-01704-MCE-KJM P.

February 19, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 28, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 28, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.


Summaries of

Madrigal v. Board of Prison Terms

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 19, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-01704-MCE-KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Madrigal v. Board of Prison Terms

Case Details

Full title:RENE MADRIGAL, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 19, 2008

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-01704-MCE-KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008)