From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madrid v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1607 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1607 WBS KJN P

08-10-2011

ANDREW MADRID, Plaintiff, v. TIM VIRGA, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 1, 2011 request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Madrid v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1607 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Madrid v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW MADRID, Plaintiff, v. TIM VIRGA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1607 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)