Madrid v. Lawrence

Full title: ANDREW MADRID, Plaintiff, v. FRED LAWRENCE, Defendant,

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California

Date published: Jan 16, 2015

14CV0768-GPC-DHB (S.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2015)

Opinion

ANDREW MADRID, Plaintiff, v. FRED LAWRENCE, Defendant, No. 14CV0768-GPC-DHB United States District Court, Southern District of California January 16, 2015

          JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL BY COURT UNDER LOCAL CIVIL RULE 83.11 FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

          Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel United States District Judge

         The above entitled cause, having come before the court on a calendar call pursuant to notice under Local Rule 83.11: a party proceeding pro se must keep the court and opposing parties advised as to current address. If mail directed to a pro se plaintiff by the clerk at the plaintiffs last designated address is returned by the Post Office, and if such plaintiff fails to notify the court and opposing parties within 60 days thereafter of the plaintiffs current address, the court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

         IT IS ORDERED, ADJLIDGED AND DECREED that the above entitled cause is hereby dismissed, without prejudice, for want of prosecution.