From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madrid v. Graf

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 25, 2023
1:21-CV-00019-H (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2023)

Opinion

1:21-CV-00019-H

09-25-2023

ARMANDO MADRID, Institutional ID No. 01425800 SID No. 01581442 Plaintiff, v. CHERRY K. GRAF, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

James Wesley Hendrix United States District Judge

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation that this case be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and repeated failure to obey an order of this Court. Plaintiff filed objections.

“The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In contrast, the district judge reviews any unobjected-to findings, conclusions, and recommendations for plain error. The Court has examined the record and reviewed the unobjected-to portions of the FCR for plain error and, finding none, expressly accepts and adopts those portions of the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation.

Additionally, in light of Plaintiff's specific objections, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the relevant portions of the FCR and the record in this case. In his objections, Plaintiff explains that he is receiving medical treatment that makes litigating his case a challenge and asks for additional opportunities to further develop his claims. But the record reflects that Plaintiff received multiple opportunities to participate in his case and still failed to do so-in one case even refusing to participate in a scheduled Spears hearing.

Thus, the Court overrules the objections and accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Additionally, the Court has learned from TDCJ Classification that Plaintiff passed away on July 29, 2023.

The Court therefore orders:

1. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice for under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and repeated failure to obey an order of this Court.

2. All relief not expressly granted, and any pending motions are denied. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Madrid v. Graf

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 25, 2023
1:21-CV-00019-H (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Madrid v. Graf

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO MADRID, Institutional ID No. 01425800 SID No. 01581442 Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 25, 2023

Citations

1:21-CV-00019-H (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2023)