Opinion
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01706-RMW-HRL
03-21-2013
Frank Madren, Plaintiff(s), v. Belden, Inc., Defendant(s).
Christine H. Long Attorney for Plaintiff Kristin Paiva Attorney for Defendant
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R, 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[ ] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule J 6-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
[×] Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to participate in private mediation. The parties are currently working together to select a mediator.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[ ] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[×] other requested deadline: September 30, 2012
Christine H. Long
Attorney for Plaintiff
Kristin Paiva
Attorney for Defendant
[PROPOSED] ORDER
[×] The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
[ ] The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________________
United States District/Magistrate Judge
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."