From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madonia v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jun 20, 2011
6:09-CV-0552 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2011)

Opinion

6:09-CV-0552.

June 20, 2011

Office of Peter W. Antonowicz, Peter W. Antonowicz, Esq., Rome, NY, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Social Security Administration, Vernon Norwood, Esq., Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of Regional General Counsel, Region II, New York, NY, Attorney for Defendant.


ORDER


The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini, duly filed on the 2nd day of June 2011. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.

2. The Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Report-Recommendation and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g).

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Madonia v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jun 20, 2011
6:09-CV-0552 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Madonia v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DANA M. MADONIA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, as Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jun 20, 2011

Citations

6:09-CV-0552 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2011)