From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madison v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jan 28, 2016
133 A.3d 200 (Del. 2016)

Summary

rejecting Mr. Madison's direct appeal claim that the State suppressed exculpatory DNA evidence-"In its March 19, 2014 Superior Court Criminal Rule 16 disclosures, the State indicated that DNA was pending. At trial, Detective DiSabatino testified that no DNA testing was performed. The State confirmed in its closing arguments that no evidence was sent for DNA testing."

Summary of this case from State v. Madison

Opinion

No. 147, 2015

01-28-2016

Jerome Madison, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. State of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Madison v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jan 28, 2016
133 A.3d 200 (Del. 2016)

rejecting Mr. Madison's direct appeal claim that the State suppressed exculpatory DNA evidence-"In its March 19, 2014 Superior Court Criminal Rule 16 disclosures, the State indicated that DNA was pending. At trial, Detective DiSabatino testified that no DNA testing was performed. The State confirmed in its closing arguments that no evidence was sent for DNA testing."

Summary of this case from State v. Madison
Case details for

Madison v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jerome Madison, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. State of Delaware…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Jan 28, 2016

Citations

133 A.3d 200 (Del. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Madison

The factual outline of Madison's crimes is set forth in the Delaware Supreme Court's direct appeal…

State v. Madison

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A more detailed account of Mr. Madison's crimes is set forth in the…