From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 22, 2017
226 So. 3d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5D16-4352.

09-22-2017

Javier MADERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant's convictions and sentences but do so without prejudice to Appellant filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) or 3.850 on his claim that the imposition of drug offender probation in this case is illegal. Appellant failed to preserve this claim for review on direct appeal by either contemporaneously objecting to the alleged sentencing error or by filing a motion pursuant to rule 3.800(b)(2). See Jackson v. State , 983 So.2d 562, 569 (Fla. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Madera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 22, 2017
226 So. 3d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Madera v. State

Case Details

Full title:Javier MADERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Sep 22, 2017

Citations

226 So. 3d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)