From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddy v. Lavida Massage Franchise Dev.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 11, 2022
22-CV-5961 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 11, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-5961 (JGK)

11-11-2022

VERONICA MADDY, Plaintiff, v. LAVIDA MASSAGE FRANCHISE DEVELOPMENT, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

John G. Koeltl, United States District Judge

It having been reported to the Court that the parties have reached an agreement to settle this action, it is hereby ordered that this matter be discontinued with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that within 30 days of the date of this order, counsel for the plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

All pending motions are dismissed as moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Maddy v. Lavida Massage Franchise Dev.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 11, 2022
22-CV-5961 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Maddy v. Lavida Massage Franchise Dev.

Case Details

Full title:VERONICA MADDY, Plaintiff, v. LAVIDA MASSAGE FRANCHISE DEVELOPMENT, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 11, 2022

Citations

22-CV-5961 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 11, 2022)