From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddox v. Drake

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 16, 1910
112 P. 969 (Okla. 1910)

Opinion

No. 1253

Opinion Filed November 16, 1910.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Case-Made — Expiration of Time. Where the time granted by the trial court within which to make and serve a case-made expires before the case is made and served, the court thereafter is without power to grant a further extension for that purpose.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal from Washita County Court.

Action by Annie Drake against C. W. Maddox. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error. Appeal dismissed.

Burnette Beets, for plaintiff in error.

Smith Wagner, for defendant in error.


The question involved in this case is raised by a motion to dismiss, filed by the defendant in error. The record shows that on the 19th day of November, 1908, the cause below was duly submitted to a jury and tried, and a verdict rendered in favor of the defendant in error, plaintiff below. That on the same day the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled on the second day of December, 1908, and the defendant was given 60 days in which to make and serve a case-made for the Supreme Court. That on the 2d day of February, 1909, the court extended the time within which to make and serve a case-made for a period of 60 days, and within this period the case was made and served. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. The 60 days originally granted within which to make and serve a case-made expired on the 1st day of February, 1909; thereafter the court was without jurisdiction to grant a further extension for that purpose.

The appeal is dismissed, at the cost of the plaintiff in error.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Maddox v. Drake

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 16, 1910
112 P. 969 (Okla. 1910)
Case details for

Maddox v. Drake

Case Details

Full title:MADDOX v. DRAKE

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 16, 1910

Citations

112 P. 969 (Okla. 1910)
112 P. 969

Citing Cases

Talliaferro v. Exchange Bank of Perry

It is true the trial court attempted on October 8, 1913, to further extend the time; but that action was a…

Lovejoy, Russell & James v. Graham

The case-made was not served upon the plaintiffs until after said ninety days had expired; but it is insisted…