From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madden v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 22, 2013
Case No. CV 11-5652 FMO(JC) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-5652 FMO(JC)

2013-10-22

RYAN P. MADDEN, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.


REVISED ORDER ACCEPTING

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the "Petition"), the Renewed Motion to Dismiss the Petition and all documents submitted in support of, and in opposition thereto, and all of the records in this case, including the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), the Magistrate Judge's Minute Order filed on October 10, 2013 ("October 10 Order") denying petitioner's motions for leave to conduct discovery, an evidentiary hearing, and third request for extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation, which were filed after the Report and Recommendation was filed, as well as such underlying motions/request. The Court has also reviewed the decision in McQuiggin v. Perkins, 133 S. Ct. 1924 (2013) which was issued after the Report and Recommendation was filed. The Court agrees with the October 10 Order and approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Renewed Motion to Dismiss the Petition is granted and that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice as time-barred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

____________________________

HONORABLE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Madden v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 22, 2013
Case No. CV 11-5652 FMO(JC) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Madden v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:RYAN P. MADDEN, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 22, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 11-5652 FMO(JC) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2013)

Citing Cases

Northfield Ins. Co. v. Garcia

Court filings and proceedings are proper subjects of judicial notice. See, e.g., United States v. Black, 482…

McVey v. McVey

) (taking judicial notice of the docket in an underlying bankruptcy proceedings); Rodriguez v. Disner, 688…