From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madan v. Malik

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 2021
No. 2021-06279 (N.Y. App. Div. Nov. 12, 2021)

Opinion

2021-06279

11-12-2021

MANISH MADAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. SUNITA D. MALIK, ALSO KNOWN AS DOLLY MALIK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.

MAUREEN A. PINEAU, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT. BARNEY & BARNEY, ROCHESTER (BRIAN J. BARNEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.


MAUREEN A. PINEAU, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.

BARNEY & BARNEY, ROCHESTER (BRIAN J. BARNEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Richard A. Dollinger, A.J.), entered November 13, 2020. The order, among other things, adjudged that plaintiff shall replace defendant's vehicle whenever the mileage exceeds 75, 000 miles.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Madan v. Malik

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 2021
No. 2021-06279 (N.Y. App. Div. Nov. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Madan v. Malik

Case Details

Full title:MANISH MADAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. SUNITA D. MALIK, ALSO…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 12, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-06279 (N.Y. App. Div. Nov. 12, 2021)