From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mad Apparel, Inc. v. Brain Sentry, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 23, 2015
5:15-cv-01100-PSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion

          DURIE TANGRI LLP CLEMENT S. ROBERTS, TIMOTHY C. SAULSBURY, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff MAD APPAREL, INC. D/B/A ATHOS WORKS, INC.

          REED & SCARDINO LLP Craig Jepson, Austin, TX, Attorneys for Defendant BRAIN SENTRY, INC.


          JOINT STIPULATION SUSPENDING DEADLINES PENDING SETTLEMENT

          PAUL SINGH GREWAL, District Judge.

         Plaintiff Mad Apparel, Inc. d/b/a Athos Works, Inc. and Defendant Brain Sentry, Inc. ("the Parties") request that the Court suspend all deadlines pending implementation of a signed settlement agreement reached by the Parties which disposes of all claims and counterclaims. The Parties anticipate filing dismissal papers within 20 days.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL RECORD.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mad Apparel, Inc. v. Brain Sentry, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 23, 2015
5:15-cv-01100-PSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Mad Apparel, Inc. v. Brain Sentry, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MAD APPAREL, INC. D/B/A ATHOS WORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BRAIN SENTRY…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

5:15-cv-01100-PSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)