Opinion
CASE NO. CV 11-06198 SC
05-06-2013
MACY'S INC. and MACYS.COM, INC. Plaintiff(s), v. STRATEGIC MARKS, LLC Defendant(s).
Anthony F. Lo Cicero Attorney for Plaintiff Benjamin Ashurov Attorney for Defendant
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L,R, 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[√] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private Process:The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[ ] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) __________
[ ] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[√] other requested deadline June 7, 2013
Anthony F. Lo Cicero
Attorney for Plaintiff
Benjamin Ashurov
Attorney for Defendant
[PROPOSED] ORDER
[×] The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
[ ] The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Samuel Conti When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."