From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macy v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1937
253 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

December 24, 1937.


Order denying plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the counterclaim contained in the amended answer on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiffs to reply to the counterclaim within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Macy v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1937
253 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Macy v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MACY and EMANUEL M. SPIEGEL, Doing Business under the Firm Name of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1937

Citations

253 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)